350
ed thereon would not last seventy five years. The same remark
applies to land sold for the erection of villa residences
though in a lesser degree. What will we think suffer most will
be sales of land for industries and valuable buildings such
as the Banks & Clubs & the larger Mercantile Houses & Shops.
There is another point to be considered. Trust funds are not
allowed to be invested on mortgage upon lease-hold properties
with less than sixty years to run. It is easy to conceive that
Trustees & Investing Companies would not regard as a first
class investment a mortgage on a property the title to which
would cease to exist say in forty years.
With regard to the concluding paragraph of your
letter it is difficult to say what suitable provision could
be made for the protection of the lessee. In the case of go-
downs & buildings used for offices it would be possible to
compensate the lessee on the basis of the rentals he was re-
ceiving but it would be difficult to compensate any person or persons owning property used for industrial purposes.
Take the China Sugar or Taikoo Sugar Refinery,
their buildings may have cost two million dollars. The profits
one year are 30% on aggregate capital of about five millions, another year 5%
We do not gather from your letter that it is
the intention of the Secretary of State to grant compensation
for loss of business profits. On the contrary it would seem
that
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.